If you have the means to get out of major centers right now, I would do that. I also recommend that people stay away from strategic locations, such as ports, radar facilities, airports, oil rigs etc. As these areas will be on the top of the list to take down for resource stripping a country, and taking the ability away to go mobile. I know there is a mass exodus out of large cities in USA right now, so if you can sell your house and buy a rural house, it would, in a nuclear situation, give you much higher probability to survive an initial nuclear strike. Iwould go that route....I have gone that route already and commute 30 mins to work daily, from a town that has very little industrial significance.
Continue getting info from resources that are proven to be trusted and accurate.... I use amtv as my best source of info for Syria, war etc. But I watch others and I even watch some mainstream to gauge their rhetoric as well. (We know their playbook now, so I'd say the elites are frantically trying to change their strategies as we are shining huge spotlights on them, this is also a time that they will make lots of mistakes due to trying new plans) so watch for their dumb stories...( which usually means the elites are planning something and keeping the sheep busy with stupid things) , watch for their ramp ups....such as the Syrian gas attack ( where they show horrific images to incite an emotional response, usually meaning they are trying to lead the heard through the power of suggestion) and pay close attention to trump, his team and what other leaders and their teams are... and what they are doing. But all in all, it's just guess work without whistleblowers and good contacts.
A good thing to do right now is to print out, so you have a hard copy of many different things that you don't know how to do. Such as, locating and identifying edibles, how to purify water, how to clean a gun if you don't know, how to hunt, clean and store meat, preserving food, things of that nature, cause if all hell breaks loose you probably won't have full control of the net, so having these hard copies will be very useful.
In recent events, what I see, and this is strictly my opinion:
I don't think there will be a nuclear strike. If you look at what happened, there's was a chemical attack, trump responded. He didn't really hit anything that significant from reports I've heard. Hardly any casualties....from what I've heard. He had a meeting with the president of china on Thursday and Friday, and now china is sending 150k troops to nk, and telling nk, who were supposed allies with them, that there's now a line in the sand for them, and they are willing to bomb all of nk nuclear power stations. We know trump is a great deal maker, I ask.... why the change of heart from china? What talks transpired for this new development to happen?
To me, it kind of looks like trump just laid ww3 on the table to see if these other superpowers really want this, now that they know he is serious, maybe they can move from that ww3 mentality and try to consolidate differences. Idk...like I said, that's my opinion.
Imho.... I think that an organized attack from all terror cells around the world at the same time in every major city is a more plausible idea of what would transpire. The chess pieces are already set up that way, and it too would give the world the go ahead to move into Syria and wipe them out, without the risk of nuclear fallout. It would also throw a lot of people off because nuclear war is being pushed so much that not many would expect an attack like that when all the rhetoric points in the direction of nuclear war. But in the end.... who really knows.